The Content Ambitious Man: Reconciling Faith and Ambition

I. Introduction


A. The Average Religious Guy Wants to Convice you That Amibtion and Faith are opposing forces.

The only problem is that this philosophy is dead wrong. The average person looking to place faith and ambition in opposition is just looking for an excuse to justify his personal failures.

“If I’m not successful and you are, the only reason is because I’m more spiritual than you are! You must be really worldly to have amassed all that worldly success”.

Just like these men do when they purport the Poverty Gospel, they must demonize ambition and worldly success as well.

Their only choice to make themselves feel better is to make the issue of success a moral one. The fastest way for religious people to claim the high ground is to take an amoral position and convert it into a moral one.

By doing so they make their necessity a virtue.

content ambitious

B. People are more successful now than ever.

Even people who are “failures” are more successful than people have ever been in history, financially speaking. They may not have the drive or personal success, but they have money that civilizations past could only dream of.

This is just like the poverty gospel where even the “poor” have more material wealth than the wealthy would have had just a few hundred years ago, let alone when the Bible was being written.

There is no room for anyone to babble on when it comes to success, failure, and ambition. Even people with no ambition have luxuries that the hardest-working businessmen couldn’t have dreamed of in centuries past.


C. Thesis statement: Contrary to the false philosophy of the poverty gospel, contentment, and ambition are not mutually exclusive but rather complement each other.

Colossians 3:23 is the key biblical text supporting this idea.

II. Understanding the False Philosophy of the Poverty Gospel

A. You already know what the poverty gospel is. It’s the envious idea that people who have wealth are automatically evil. It has no rationality behind it, or any validity in reality, but nevertheless, it is popular in religious circles. Including the religions of environmentalism and socialism.

Religious people desperately need wealth and faith to be opposing forces so that they can justify their lack of wealth to themselves.

But it’s all relative – again reflect on centuries past and you will see the poor today have unimaginable luxuries compared to the people of the past.


B. Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Job, and Joseph – Content Ambitious Men

The Bible describes Abraham as a man rich in livestock silver and gold [Gen 13:2].

Now is Abraham evil because of his wealth?
Is he a bad guy because he amassed possessions in this material world?

No, we know that is not the case. We know it is possible to be Spiritual and wealthy at the same time. The two are not opposed. And Abraham’s is a great example of that.

What about Isaac [Gen 26:12-13]? He followed in his father’s footsteps and became so wealthy that he was the envy of the Land. Was this man materialistic and evil because he amassed so much wealth and possessions that he made other people feel bad? He hurt their feelings with how successful he is, but he would still be righteous.

Jacob followed the example of his father and his father before him [Gen 30:43]. Amassing possessions to the point of “excessive wealth”.

Did that possession make him evil? No.
Was he able to be righteous despite wealth? Absolutely.

Perhaps the most striking example is Job. This is a man whose story opens with an outline of his possessions, and of his character. Here is a man whose character is made more important because of his wealth. He is more impressive because despite having more money than everyone around him, he is still a righteous and just man.

Though He would lose all these possessions, he would maintain God as his priority. He never lost focus on God because he was a righteous man. And he was rewarded with double the possessions that he had before.

The faith of each of these men is not negative because of their wealth, but rather it is made more impressive.

Almost anyone can be righteous while they are poor. Give them a little money or a little power and they will show you who they truly are.

III. The Essence of Colossians 3:23: “Doing All as Unto the Lord”


A. Colossians 2:23 tells us clearly and succinctly that the attitude we should have while working is that we are actually working for the Lord.

This mentality helps us to maintain integrity in work. We might steal from our fellow man, but would we steal from Christ?

Additionally, it gives us permission to work with intensity and work to be successful.

If you were to work as if you were working for God and not your “stupid boss”, wouldn’t you be more successful? I would argue that you would be very successful at least within your own character.


B. By working for the Lord, you may start to find contentment in life.

Your job may be boring, and your co-workers may be annoying, but what your hands have found to do can be something that you honor God by doing.


C. Colossians 3:23 dispels the popular myth that if I’m working hard in the material world, I must be worldly.

No, we have a biblical admonition to work hard in the secular workplace. Therefore faith and ambition cannot be opposed.

IV. The Complementary Nature of Contentment and Ambition


A. Many have difficulty because their ambition overrides their ability to have peace.

They are so hungry to be successful that they cannot be peaceful anymore. I have been in that boat many times, so I understand the argument.

But since there is a biblical admonition to work and provide valuable service, and there is also a biblical admonition to be content, we know that both must be true.

God would not ask people to do things that are impossible or mutually exclusive. Therefore in some way, it must be possible to be content and ambitious.

When used correctly, ambition and contentment can have a symbiotic relationship, but it all depends on your mentality.

Attitude is always the key.

The key is that both your contentment and your ambition must exist in the present moment.

When you look into the future constantly or look constantly outside yourself at what you don’t have, you will find it hard to be content.

Also if you are constantly focused on the outcome of your ambition, it will be difficult to be content.

Rather you need to be ambitious for the present moment. Release your need to control the outcome, or the results, of your ambition.

When ambition exists right now, it is powerful. When I become ambitious for the present moment I can concentrate on the work right in front of me. And I can focus on doing the best I can right now. That is present-focused ambition.

And this present focus creates peace. Living in the past or present creates anxiety. But anxiety has a hard time living in the present.

When my goal is to work for the Lord and not for men, but I am content no matter the final results of my work – I am a content ambitious man.

I love goals and I am chasing outcomes in my life. So in no way am I suggesting you not have goals, plans, or things you are pursuing. But what you must do is what the ship captain does. He pulls out his map, marks the port he is sailing to, puts the map away, and sets sail, focusing on the process of sailing rather than an obsession with the port he is sailing to.

So be sure to have goals, but once you set your goals, put them away. Glance at them from time to time to check progress and course correct if you are going the wrong way. But do not obsess over how long it is taking to get there or how difficult it is. You must exist in the present.

The way to be the content ambitious man is to ground your ambition and contentment in the present moment.

Be ambitious for “the now”.

Concentrate that focus on the present and let go of your need to control the outcome. Trying to control the results is a surefire way to create anxiety in your life.

Where contentment provides peace amidst challenges, and ambition drives growth and progress.

V. Contentment: A Foundation for Healthy Ambition

Contentment is “present-oriented”. You are content when you look at what you have right now and are at peace with it. You are not looking outside yourself and generating envy for what you don’t have. You simply have peace with what you do have.

Contentment, therefore, is the foundation for ambition. As you ground yourself in the present to be content, you then. Have a good starting point to “leash” your ambition. Not that you are limiting yourself, setting small goals, or avoiding challenges and work – but you “leash” your ambition to the present. That will give you greater peace.

If you are struggling with contentment it could be because you are missing out on gratitude. A simple but effective technique to work on this is to make a gratitude list. You’ve likely heard about that a million times, and it almost seems silly to talk about, but for greater contentment, count your blessings – have gratitude. We sing the hymn “Count your many blessings“, but how few of us do this?

The gratitude list brings your blessings into your awareness. We forget about everything we have because it falls out of our awareness and we become accustomed to it. But activate your attention spotlight and point it at your blessings and you will realize how well off you are.

B. Without grounding in the present moment, ambition will be hollow.

Has nothing to control it, and it will run wild. You will become obsessed with outcomes and rob yourself of the pleasure of the process.

Many make the mistake of thinking that if they are content and thankful for what they have, they will become less hard-working and less ambitious. That will only happen if your ambition is future-oriented. Turn the fiery focus of your ambition to the present. Align it with the now, and you will have the same burning drive you have always had, and it will be directed into a moment that brings you greater peace – the present moment.

Ambition that is future-oriented, and that is detached from the present moment will create unnecessary pain through greed. There is nothing wrong with working to gain material things. But without gratitude or a present focus, it becomes a hollow obsession that drains the joy from the process

VI. Ambition: An Expression of Faith


Ambition, when aligned with God’s statutes for wealth management, becomes an expression of faith and obedience through proper stewardship of talents and resources. Faith is action-based. Taking action in the direction of our goals does not mean we lack faith in God to provide for us. That is the type of mentality that results from perverting the teachings of the Bible.


God has always expected His people to take action. Each man is personally responsible for his own life and must act according to [Ezk. 18:20] This applies in every avenue of man’s walk: from religion to profession, to health, to finance.

A Man’s task is to row his own boat without expecting God to do all the heavy lifting.

Conclusion & Key Takeaways

The content-ambitious man exists. It is possible to be both content and ambitious at the same time.

  1. Misconception of Faith and Ambition: Some suggest faith and ambition oppose each other, attributing success to spirituality over worldly achievement. This is a fallacy used to justify personal failures.
  2. Success: Relative and Multifaceted: Even “failures” today possess more material wealth than historical civilizations. The poverty gospel notion and demonizing ambition are attempts to morally justify the lack of success.
  3. Biblical Examples: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Job, and Joseph amassed wealth without compromising their righteousness. Their faith and abundance coexisted, showcasing that spirituality and material success aren’t mutually exclusive.
  4. Colossians 3:23: Encourages working for the Lord, promoting integrity, intensity, and permission for ambition in the secular world. This dispels the myth that striving for success in the material realm equates to worldliness.
  5. Contentment and Ambition Synergy: Balancing ambition and contentment is possible. Grounding ambition in the present moment fosters peace. Being present-focused on ambition while releasing the need to control outcomes cultivates content ambition.
  6. Contentment as Foundation: Contentment, rooted in gratitude and present awareness, acts as the base for healthy ambition. A gratitude list can enhance contentment by highlighting one’s blessings.
  7. Ambition Aligned with Faith: Ambition, when guided by biblical principles of stewardship and faith, aligns with proper wealth management. It expresses obedience through action while acknowledging personal responsibility.
  8. Taking Personal Responsibility: Faith doesn’t absolve individuals from taking action in their lives. Man is accountable and must actively engage in all aspects of life, including religion, profession, health, and finance.

Dietary Restrictions in The Old Testament

Throughout the Old Testament, there are a number of dietary restrictions that were placed on the ancient Israelites. These restrictions were given to the Israelites through Moses in the book of Leviticus, and were intended to keep the Israelites safe from harmful diseases and illnesses.

Many of the animals that were forbidden for consumption by the Israelites were actually animals that were known to be carriers of diseases.
Dietary restrictions

For example, pigs were forbidden for consumption because they were known by God to carry trichinosis, a disease that can be fatal if left untreated. Other animals that were forbidden included shellfish, which were known to carry toxins, and birds of prey, which were known to carry disease.

Some might argue that these dietary restrictions were unnecessary, or that they were simply arbitrary rules meant to control the behavior of the Israelites.

However, it’s important to remember that these rules were given to the Israelites by God Himself, and that they were intended to protect his people from harm. In fact, we know now with modern science that the dietary restrictions protected the Israelites from the health consequences they would have otherwise sustained had they eaten these animals.

These dietary restrictions are a reminder that God does not make stupid rules.

Even when some of his commandments seem like mere restrictions or limitations, they are ultimately for the betterment of his people. That is something we can still learn from today. Whatever rules we read about in the New Testament are there for our benefit. They are there to protect us from the consequences of our own choices.

Left to our own devices, we engage in behaviors that damage us personally and societally. They damage our personal health and life fulfillment. And they damage the fabric of society.

Look around at the groups of people with no morals and no guiding Christian principles. They live lives of difficulty and confusion.

The Bible is a practical book of knowledge, not just a book of rules of ancient stories.

As Christians, we can learn an important lesson from these dietary restrictions. Just as God gave these rules to the Israelites for their own protection, he also gives us commandments and guidelines that are meant to protect us and help us grow spiritually.

Sometimes, these rules might seem restrictive or difficult to follow. For example, Christians are called to avoid sexual immorality, to speak the truth, and to love their neighbors as themselves. These commandments might seem like mere restrictions that limit our freedom.

However, just like the dietary restrictions in the Old Testament, these commandments are ultimately for our own good. When we follow God’s commandments, we grow in our faith and become more like Christ.

In our culture and within our own personalities, there is often a tendency to view rules and restrictions as weaknesses, and to see breaking the rules as a sign of strength and independence. I know this is my dominating thought, as a person who despises any impingement on my ability to choose.

However, as Christians, we should recognize that following God’s commandments is a sign of moral strength and masculinity. It takes courage and conviction to resist temptation, to speak the truth in a world that values lies, and to love others even when it’s difficult.

The dietary restrictions in the Old Testament are a reminder that God does not make stupid rules. Even when his commandments seem restrictive, they are ultimately for our own good. As Christians, we should embrace God’s commandments as a means of growing in our faith and becoming more like Christ. This applies to issues of masculinity as well, as following God’s commandments requires true strength and courage.

Does God Condone Slavery?

Does God Condone Slavery

One of the more popular attacks made on Christianity and the Bible is this idea.

“The Bible endorses slavery”.

The short response is this: there is a huge difference between endorsing slavery and providing regulations for the institution of slavery that has been consistently practiced across time and culture.

Additionally, we must define terms when we talk about slavery. Slavery in America is a far cry from slavery across time and history. Each iteration of slavery in history is different across time, therefore blanket statements cannot be made about slavery. 

I – What was slavery in history?

Human beings have always held slaves. Just because this is what human beings do does not mean that God condones it. There are many behaviors that people engage in that God does not condone – but He allows it to happen so we can use our free moral agency. God also does not condone sex outside of marriage or between people of the same gender, so He placed regulations on marriage.

The institution of slavery has changed significantly throughout history, encompassing a wide range of practices with differing levels of treatment of enslaved individuals. To fully understand the complexities of slavery, it is crucial to examine the cultural context of different eras and regions.

slavery

1 – Slavery in Ancient Egypt: The Plight of the Israelites

In ancient Egypt, the Israelites endured a period of brutal slavery. As depicted in the biblical narrative of Exodus, they faced harsh labor, dehumanization, and oppressive conditions. This would continue for about 400 years. The Israelites were subjected to forced labor, building monumental structures such as the pyramids under the command of their Egyptian masters. Their treatment exemplified the extreme end of the spectrum regarding the abuse and mistreatment of enslaved individuals.

Why is it then, when people criticize slavery, that no one points fingers at the Egyptians for their treatment of slaves across centuries? No, but we will take a vacation to go photograph the Spinx, pyramids, and other great structures so we can post them on social media. We call the result of slave labor in Egypt one of the great wonders of the world but tear down historic plantations in America. 

This is one of the many examples of a double standard with regard to passing judgment on civilizations that have owned slaves. Much of it is rooted in simple hatred of America. Racist individuals blame America for slavery but turn a blind eye to all other civilizations that have engaged in the same. 

2 –  Slavery in Ancient Greece and Rome: A Shift in Dynamics

Ancient Greece

In ancient Greece, slavery played a significant role in the socioeconomic system. Slaves were acquired through various means, including capture in wars, debt bondage, and birth into slavery. While the treatment of slaves varied, they generally experienced a lack of personal freedom and were subject to their owners’ authority. However, some slaves in Greece enjoyed relatively better treatment, particularly those who worked as household servants or tutors. 

Roman Empire

Slavery in the Roman Empire demonstrated notable shifts in treatment compared to earlier civilizations. The Romans acquired slaves through conquest, trade, and birth. While some slaves endured harsh conditions, such as those engaged in manual labor or as gladiators, others held more privileged positions. Slaves were employed as tutors, doctors, accountants, and administrators, and their skills were valued. Roman society recognized that treating slaves with fairness and respect could help with productivity and loyalty. Some slaves were even able to earn their freedom through work or valor in gladiatorial tournaments. 

3 – Cultural Context: Understanding the Variations in Slavery

It is crucial to acknowledge that not all forms of slavery are equal, and the treatment of slaves varied significantly depending on the cultural context. And nearly every nation across history can point to a time when they likely employed some version of slavery. And some even suggest today that a modern form of slavery exists called “wage slavery”, which is not a completely misguided notion. 

Slavery in ancient Egypt was characterized by its cruelty and dehumanization, while in ancient Rome, slaves could experience a wide range of treatment, from harsh conditions to relative fairness and respect.

The cultural, social, and economic factors of each society influenced the treatment of slaves. In Rome, for instance, the concept of “paterfamilias” granted masters immense power over their slaves. However, philosophical ideas and shifting moral standards also played a role in shaping attitudes toward slavery. Stoic philosophy, prevalent in ancient Rome, emphasized the moral duty of masters to treat slaves justly and humanely.

Here’s a note from Apologetics Press on Slavery in America: 

Hitting closer to home, the pages of history dealing with the formative years of the United States are despoiled with gruesome stories of ships carrying slaves sold to the Americas by their fellow Africans (and others, e.g., Arabians). These slaves frequently were packed so densely in lower ship decks that many of them died of disease or malnutrition. Those who lived to see the States soon learned that their fate hinged upon those who purchased them. Some slaves were ushered into homes with kind masters, decent living facilities, good food, and freedom to worship. Other slaves were purchased by cruel, greedy people who overworked them, abused them, underfed them, and allowed them no freedom

II – What was slavery in the Bible?

Slavery means different things in different places.


The Israelites were slaves to Egyptians in the classic sense of slavery. this is what we might traditionally think of when we picture slavery.

There are references to slaves in the new testament, especially the Epistles which advocate for fair and equal treatment of slaves, who were likely closer to employees than actual slaves in some instances. But this is not what we might think of when we picture slaves.

Modern people often picture slavery in America when they are asked to think about what slavery means. Many times, American slavery was closer to voluntary work [if there is such a thing] than what the Israelites were experiencing. In fact, it may be closer to what we classically call “jobs”. And in fact, later in the Biblical text, Christians will be told to “become slaves of righteousness” [Rom 6:18]. And the etymology of the word teaches us that a slave is someone who sets aside the personal desire for the desire of the master [a lesson in itself].

III – Human nature.

Human beings have engaged in various immoral practices throughout history, including slavery. However, it is essential to understand that just because people engage in certain behaviors does not mean that God endorses or condones those actions. God allows humans to exercise their free moral agency, which includes making choices that are contrary to His will.

Slavery is an unfortunate consequence of human free will, not a divine endorsement.

The Bible often portrays God using the behavior of His people to bring about His ultimate purposes. This does not mean that God approves of every action taken by individuals, including slavery. Instead, God may work within the existing societal framework to gradually shape human understanding and guide people toward justice and righteousness.

Throughout history, we have witnessed gradual transformations in societal norms, including the abolition of slavery [thanks to America, the supposed boogeyman of slavery], driven by a growing understanding of human rights and dignity.

When examining the New Testament’s references to slavery, it is key to recognize that the institution described differs significantly from the brutal, dehumanizing slavery that we often associate with historical accounts. 

In the context of the New Testament, the term “slavery” referred to a broader range of relationships that encompassed general work and employment arrangements. Slavery in the ancient Roman world involved various degrees of servitude, ranging from indentured laborers to those employed as household servants.

It is important to note that the New Testament teachings emphasized fair treatment and respect for slaves, urging masters to treat their servants justly and kindly. The Bible advocates for human-like work conditions.

IV – Slavery is a Cultural Phenomenon

The Bible is a collection of texts written over a long period of time, reflecting the ethical development and understanding of human societies at various times. God’s attitude and thoughts towards slavery never change because God Himself does not change [Malachi 3:6]. The Bible contains passages that reflect the cultural norms of their time, including slavery, but they should not be seen as definitive statements on God’s stance regarding slavery.

Slavery existed across cultures and across time. God did not approve of it, He simply communicated to His people the manner in which slaves were to be treated which included fairness, decency, and respect that is deserved by all people.

V – America receives the most criticism about slavery even though it was a county that Abolished it. 

Very few people sit around criticizing China for the fact that they have slaves even now, in this very day. If you own a smartphone, chances are it was produced as a result of modern slave labor.

But many modern people are too steeped in the irrational hatred of America, which is generally their own country, to have time to pay attention to Chinese slave labor. And even if they knew, most of them likely would not care. After all, “Chinese slavery is something happening “over there”, it does not affect me, so why should I care?”

While slavery has been a dark chapter in human history across various regions, it is important to address the selective criticism leveled at certain countries, particularly America. Despite being a country that abolished slavery, America often receives the majority of the blame and scrutiny regarding its historical involvement in the institution. This focus on America, while important for acknowledging past wrongs, overshadows the ongoing instances of slavery in other parts of the world.

China continues to face accusations of forced labor and human rights abuses.

In recent years, reports have highlighted the existence of modern-day slavery within manufacturing and agriculture in China. However, these instances receive considerably less attention and criticism compared to America’s historical past.

The discrepancies in criticizing different countries suggest that the issue of slavery is often influenced by political, social, and historical factors. While it is essential to confront and acknowledge historical wrongs, it is equally important to shed light on present-day instances of slave owning, irrespective of the country involved. 

Matt 19:3-10 outlines the key authority for the fact that there were some things permitted in the Old Testament that did not reflect God’s will.

Because of the hardness of Israel’s heart, God allowed certain things, including divorce and slave owning even though these did not reflect His will. 

The OT clearly teaches people to love their neighbors (Lev 19:18). But just because something is a command in scripture does not mean that men will be obedient to it or live out the complete ideal. 

Even today, when the complete pattern for the church is laid out in the New Testament, how many denominations and religions try to invent their own path to God? The ideal exists in the NT, but men still fail to live up to it. 

Slavery often existed as a form of debtors’ prison or a way to do something with prisoners of war. And as such, humane regulations for the institution were required. 

Certain types of slavery are not morally wrong.

When someone is sentenced to prison, he is a slave of the state for a period of years, sometimes even his whole life. And during this time he is forced by the state to do things he would rather not do. His choices cost him his freedom. This is a morally acceptable revocation of freedoms which could accurately be described as slavery. 

The Israelites were forced to deal with the nations that they encountered by destroying them completely, but when they were unable to do this, they had to do something with the survivors. Usually, they put them in Servitude or under tribute. They were allowed to live but under slave conditions. 

What is better: complete eradication from the face of the earth or a life of servitude?

God does not condone slavery. He simply regulated it in scripture to allow for the humane treatment of people who would otherwise have been left to suffer under the discretion of man. 

Saul’s Decay of Humility

How often is it that men start off their lives great yet finish in disaster? What is it that causes that disaster? Why do some men begin with excellence and end poorly while others begin with nothing and finish as great men? What happens with men like Saul?

There is never only one reason for anything. All we can do is examine the trends and try to build an idea of what happened.

This happened for the famous Bible character Saul. Saul was the first king of the Israelite nation. The Bible tells us he stood head and shoulders above everyone else in the nation in height (I Samuel 9:2). 1 Samuel 9 & 10 tell the story of how Saul was chosen to be king and his coronation.

What is interesting about Saul before he took the kingship was his incredible humility.

The Bible tells us a few brief stories that show how Saul was humble. On the day that Samuel tells Saul he will reign over Israel, he responds with humility, saying that he is not a man of import in the land.

“And Saul answered and said, Am not I a Benjamite, of the smallest of the tribes of Israel? and my family the least of all the families of the tribe of Benjamin? wherefore then speakest thou so to me?”

1 Samuel 9:21
A few chapters later in the book we will be granted a glimpse into Saul’s coronation. When the Israelite nation was ready to crown him as their king, where was he? The Bible says he was hiding in the equipment.

“When he had caused the tribe of Benjamin to come near by their families, the family of Matri was taken, and Saul the son of Kish was taken: and when they sought him, he could not be found. Therefore they enquired of the Lord further, if the man should yet come thither. And the Lord answered, Behold he hath hid himself among the stuff.”

1 Samuel 10:21-22

Yet it will only take 5 more chapters of 1 Samuel for Saul to have the kingdom torn away from him because of his mistakes. While it is not clear how much time passed between these sections, it was long enough for Saul to lose his humility. Many people will latch onto this instance as one of those “Power corrupts” moments. But perhaps that is only a part of the story.

Saul was the first king of Israel. There was no previous model on how to be a king and how to manage that kind of pressure and power. Who was expecting a new king to behave differently than Saul did?

They could have modeled the pagan nations and their style of government. This is what Israel did when they demanded a king in the first place. That does not mean a man will know how to handle that power, however. It was a completely new position.

The fact of the matter is that Saul lost his humility.
Saul

Even Samuel would note this when Saul was losing the kingdom, saying that at one point Saul was once “little in his own eyes“. And by that, Samuel likely meant that Saul had humility before he was king.

“And Samuel said, When thou wast little in thine own sight, wast thou not made the head of the tribes of Israel, and the Lord anointed thee king over Israel?”

1 Samuel 15:17

Samuel delivered this message immediately after Saul returned from a battle. A battle in which he was commanded to destroy everything. Saul was to take no prisoners and completely destroy the nation. But he elected to keep king Agag alive and spare the best of the animals for sacrifices, or so he claimed.

Notice the language that king Saul uses in 1 Samuel 15 when he is confronted by Samuel. First Saul gives himself the credit. When he sees Samuel he proudly boasts that he can complete the command of the Lord. Yet when Samuel asks about the sound of animals in the background, Saul immediately turns and says that the people wanted to keep those animals. So when Saul thought he was keeping the command of the Lord, he gave himself full credit. But the second he noticed disapproval in the voice of Samuel, he knew he needed to implicate the people in his wrongdoings. Saul ignored God and did what he wanted, and this would cost him the kingdom.

Let us look at the exact account in the bible.

Now the word of the Lord came to Samuel, saying, 11 I greatly regret that I have set up Saul as king, for he has turned back from following Me, and has not performed My commandments.” And it grieved Samuel, and he cried out to the Lord all night. 12 So when Samuel rose early in the morning to meet Saul, it was told Samuel, saying, “Saul went to Carmel, and indeed, he set up a monument for himself; and he has gone on around, passed by, and gone down to Gilgal.” 13 Then Samuel went to Saul, and Saul said to him, “Blessed are you of the Lord! I have performed the commandment of the Lord.”

14 But Samuel said, “What then is this bleating of the sheep in my ears, and the lowing of the oxen which I hear?”

15 And Saul said, “They have brought them from the Amalekites; for the people spared the best of the sheep and the oxen, to sacrifice to the Lord your God; and the rest we have utterly destroyed.”

16 Then Samuel said to Saul, “Be quiet! And I will tell you what the Lord said to me last night.

And he said to him, “Speak on.”

17 So Samuel said, “When you were little in your own eyes, were you not head of the tribes of Israel? And did not the Lord anoint you king over Israel? 18 Now the Lord sent you on a mission, and said, ‘Go, and utterly destroy the sinners, the Amalekites, and fight against them until they are consumed.’ 19 Why then did you not obey the voice of the Lord? Why did you swoop down on the spoil, and do evil in the sight of the Lord?

20 And Saul said to Samuel, “But I have obeyed the voice of the Lord, and gone on the mission on which the Lord sent me, and brought back Agag king of Amalek; I have utterly destroyed the Amalekites. But the people took of the plunder, sheep, and oxen, the best of the things which should have been utterly destroyed, to sacrifice to the Lord your God in Gilgal.

1 Samuel 15: 10-21

When Saul wanted praise he took full responsibility for the victory. when Samuel had to correct him, Saul blamed the people. As you know the story, this book of the Bible ends with Saul’s death on the battlefield. Let’s revisit the first question we asked. What causes a man to end like this?

There is never just one explanation because there are too many variables to consider. All we know is Saul was once a humble man who gained a kingdom and gained power too rapidly and it broke him. What is the point? Humility can decay, which is why it is vital to maintain humility and watch for any drop of ego that might be creeping into our lives. there is no faster way to destroy ourselves than with ego.

Related: Humility

Related: Ego – A Defining Trait of Weak Men

David – Warlord – Warrior – Writer

We typically think of King David as the peaceful writer of the Psalms. He was the man who expressed his emotions so nobly and sincerely in his writing that most people picture him as emotional or as a “big softie”. I think this is a mistake and a result of only looking at David at the surface level. Sure, if you judge David by the Psalms alone, you will see his emotional being, but you must also look at his actions.

This brief article is dedicated to giving you an additional perspective on David so that you may think of his as the Warlord he was. David was a servant of God and a King inside his walls, but he was also a barbarian filled with bloodlust when it came time to step on the battlefield.

“And as the women danced, they sang out: “Saul has slain his thousands, and David his tens of thousands.” And Saul was furious and resented this song. “They have ascribed tens of thousands to David,” he said, “but only thousands to me. What more can he have but the kingdom?”

1 Samuel 18:7-8

What type of man has it in him to kills tens of thousands of people? Answer: A man with a barbaric will to kill. Modern soldiers today talk about traits that would be important in recruits who are looking to join the military. Jocko Willink says the two foundational characteristics of a soldier are “The will to kill and the will to die”. Without these a man cannot be a true warrior who performs to the best of his ability.

To put David’s number of kills in perspective, let’s think about not only the quantity but also the type of kills that David was accumulating.

These weren’t long distance kills with a gun from far away, these were face-to-face, hand-to-hand kills.

We would never disrespect or  downplay the importance of modern military men, but these guys are not even having to look at the men they are killing much of the time, and they still get PTSD when they come home. Now imagine having to kill men face to face and what that must do to the psyche of a human being.

If shooting a man can give you PTSD, what would decapitating a man do to your mind? How would your mind handle impaling enemies or severing arms and legs and getting covered in their blood? What would splitting the skull of an enemy do to your mental state? This was the state of the old school warfare that David was engaging in, yet we still think of him primarily as peaceful and emotional.

May I suggest to you that a man capable of killing ten thousand men is an absolute warlord.

This man was a master of compartmentalization. Nothing could phase him. Still, the mental burden David carried must have been so tremendous that it would crush many of us men who are accustomed to the soft, modern world.

David was a man of war even from his youth. There was obviously some sort of warrior spirit in him before he ever even saw the field of combat. The Bible speaks about David:

“But David said to Saul, “Your servant used to keep his father’s sheep, and when a lion or a bear came and took a lamb out of the flock,I went out after it and struck it, and delivered the lamb from its mouth; and when it arose against me, I caught it by its beard, and struck and killed it.Your servant has killed both lion and bear; and this uncircumcised Philistine will be like one of them, seeing he has defied the armies of the living God.” Moreover David said, “The Lord, who delivered me from the paw of the lion and from the paw of the bear, He will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine.”

1 Samuel 17:34-37
warlord

Anyone who has ever killed an animal, even a small one knows that taking life changes a man in specific ways. A man who has the fortitude to kill a bear by hand is a warrior.

The man who grabs a lion by the beard and kills it is able to channel his inner darkness into the craft of war.

David was killing animals from his youth and would eventually progress to the battlefield and take his first human life, as far as we know based on what was recorded. This is the account of David and Goliath. David would throw a stone directly into Goliath’s Forehead and then chop off his head with his own sword.

Now maybe it was somewhat of a cultural thing to chop heads and take them around, but that was still barbaric. Only a man of war could do such a thing. Even in socially acceptable animal kills like deer, men still get sick to their stomach the first time they gut the deer. Now imagine chopping off a human head, that is something that would be difficult to stomach. But it would nevertheless be fair play on the field of war.

So it was, when the Philistine arose and came and drew near to meet David, that David hurried and ran toward the army to meet the Philistine.Then David put his hand in his bag and took out a stone; and he slung it and struck the Philistine in his forehead, so that the stone sank into his forehead, and he fell on his face to the earth.So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and struck the Philistine and killed him. But there was no sword in the hand of David.Therefore David ran and stood over the Philistine, took his sword and drew it out of its sheath and killed him, and cut off his head with it.

1 Samuel 17:48-51

David would then go on to live his life waging wars and killing men and yet simultaneously writing some of the most heartfelt songs and prayers ever recorded. How did he do this?

Extreme Compartmentalization

There is no doubt that David had to put his warlike nature in a box. This is necessary even today, and most men cannot do it. Many men engage in warfare and are damaged in their minds. They cannot bear the great burden of war and its consequences.

It could be that David also had forms of PTSD. No doubt there were nights when he would sit straight up in bed, awoken by a vivid dream recounting some of his battlefield kills. He likely dreamed he was being chased by men he had personally killed on the battlefield. Those types of dreams would have been a common side effect of such a large number of kills. David may have slept with Bathsheba to comfort his own mind because of how it was tormented from war. Or perhaps he was perfectly fine. Perhaps the mind of David was untroubled by all of the war he had engaged in, knowing it was righteous. Or perhaps David was not bothered because he had the very nature and spirit of a warlord.

Whatever the answer may be, you must begin to look at King David in a different light. He is not simply a mild-mannered writer of psalms. He is a man with blood on his hands. So much blood that God would not allow him to build the temple (2 Chronicles 22:5-10). You must also embody a warrior spirit in your own life by attacking your own weakness with warlike ferocity. You must compartmentalize your life so you are in command of your emotions. Attack everything with aggression and crush your enemies.